Silent House
by Orhan Pamuk
Penguin Books Australia
There were things I had forgotten about Orhan Pamuk.
I suspect this forgetting arises from the fact the Turkish novelist is such an
elegant writer and heroically bookish figure.
Yet
close to the surface of Pamuk's work lie much darker forces such as anger and
violence and misery, a deep, shocking, spiritual misery that shakes through
everything and inevitably shakes you.
In this
misery Pamuk combines the influence of literary forefathers such as Fyodor
Dostoevsky (orchestral, even manic depth), Albert Camus (presence with
detachment), Vladimir Nabokov (an eerie eye for detail) and Thomas Bernhard
(ecstatic diatribes) with the more enraged and forsaken empathy he feels for
the dispossessed of the Middle Eastern world and the culture it has spawned, be
it Islamic or nationalist in flavour.
Not for
nothing does he resort to the phrase "a double soul" when talking of
himself, his country, the characters he writes of and even the nature of his
novels. A poet of damnation as much as hope, Pamuk is truly a beast in
bejewelled skin.
Now 60,
the 2006 Nobel laureate retains a boyish look and academic demeanour that
appears reassuring in photos. Invariably shown in his magnificent personal
library wearing a dark suit and reading glasses, Pamuk emerges as the picture
of Enlightenment reason. Sometimes these signature portraits reveal his window
view of the Bosphorus and the bridge that unites Asia with Europe. There he
sits in Istanbul on the brink of it all.
Pamuk
has been more appreciated in the West for his noble gestures as a public
intellectual and his melancholy writing style rather than his seething
existentialism and ambivalent political rage. The international success of an
Ottoman-era fable such as My Name is Red (2001) and a postmodern love story
such as The Museum of Innocence (2009) have added to his jewellery-box lustre,
as has his grand autobiography of self and place, Istanbul: Memories and the
City (2005).
The
last has become a go-to text for many who consider visiting that city, though
it is in fact the type of travel book that should be read after going there.
Moving in either direction it's likely to exhaust readers with its titanic
ebb-and-flow of personal memories and historical observations. Yes, it is a
wonderful book, but it is no place to start with Pamuk, even if it has
strangely confirmed his cultivated image.
If his
most beloved works tend towards glitter, gloom and charm, conjuring up the
authorial image of an intellectual Gatsby sadly beckoning to us from the
Bosphorus, then a novel such as Silent House - now translated into English for
the first time - unleashes Pamuk's far more turbulent side. No doubt a part of
this lies in the fact he wrote it as a young man.
First
published in Turkey in 1983, Silent House is the second novel Pamuk wrote. It
is devastating to realise he was only 31 at the time it appeared, and that all
the elements of his writing style and vision were already powerfully in place.
Any wrong-headed generalisations about his early, untranslated work being
little more than a studious mimicry of naturalistic 19th-century novelistic
conventions must now be well and truly thrown into the flames.
In
structure alone Pamuk makes dazzling use of first person narrative, shifting
the perspective between five primary characters who are kaleidoscopically
engaged with their past, their dreams and the people around them.
Fatma
is a grandmother consumed to the point of dementia by her memories and her
vicious disgust for modern life. Recep, her dwarf house-servant, is clear-eyed
and passive, profoundly alone. Faruk, Fatma's raki-swilling grandson, is a
historian surrendering himself to filicidal dissolution and his failure to tell
meaningful stories. Faruk's younger brother Metin is a hard-partying high
school student ashamed of his middle-class family's slide into poverty, a
fantasist utterly unable to distinguish between the furies of lust and love.
Hasan is a former childhood friend of Metin and his sister Nilgun (not given a
voice, but the focus of much male projection), a lower-class kid now caught up
with right-wing thugs and his own swirling loops of idealism and hatred.
One
could compare Silent House with a major contemporary novel such as Jonathan
Franzen's Freedom and the American author's attempts to create a socially and
politically engaged book of the moment built on a series of intertwined lives
and perspectives. Pamuk works with similar intentions, writing and setting his
novel during the savage lead-up to a military coup in Turkey in 1980. He does
this by oscillating between persuasive naturalism, fits of melodrama and far more
experimental writing styles than Franzen ever attempted. The word
"genius" escapes the lips, if only in recognition of Pamuk's age when
it was published. His second novel!
The
subject matter clearly springs from autobiographical experiences: Pamuk's circle
of young friends and the indolent summer beach holidays he went on with his
family. It gives the writing a dreamily recalled veracity that can turn
confronting. That Pamuk chose to zero in on such intimate energy with a
political vision in mind and write about it as Turkey was careering towards
anarchy, then chose to publish this work during the fragile democratic
transition out of military rule in 1983, shows just how bold he was.
With
one foot in the West and another in the East, it is no wonder Dostoevsky is
frequently cited by Pamuk as one of his most favourite writers. In his 2007
essay collection Other Colours, Pamuk observes that, "The originality of
Notes from the Underground issues from the dark space between Dostoevsky's
rational mind and his angry heart." He also says that Notes from the
Underground is the book where Dostoevsky "finds his true voice",
leading him on to his greatest works, Crime and Punishment, Devils and The
Brothers Karamazov.
In
Silent House it is similarly possible to witness the dark space between Pamuk's
rational mind and his angry heart that will eventually find its full, aching
dimension in what I believe to be Pamuk's best and bleakest novel, Snow (2004).
For those who wish to turn back to Silent House, Pamuk invokes a folk saying in
its pages that could serve as a prophecy, as well as a warning to fans of his
more aesthetically decorative work: "The tree is bent when it's
young."
- Mark Mordue
* First published in The Weekend Australian Review, October 20th 2012 under the title 'Genius in a turbulent dance to the music of Eastern time'.